DailySpotlight.net

Since the end of november 2010, I am studying a new Master's degree - Design and Management of IT Territorial Projects - at the Paris X university. I am currently working on my Master's thesis which will be focused on mobile payment, once again. However I have in mind a brandnew concept which could help emerging countries reduce their dependence on official development assistance. I will soon post a "powerpoint" presentation introducing this concept, as well as a short project summary. Stay tuned.

For now, I just wanted to share with view my point of view about the controversial principle of intellectual property.

... And everything went well. Haters, pessimistic people, afro-skepticals and journalists looking for sensationalist stories can be disappointed. The first football world cup in Africa was a tremendous success!

After many setbacks (simplification of the Treaty, holding of a 2nd referendum in Ireland, Czech President and Euro-pessimists opposition) the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force on 1 December 2009. It is supposed to "provide the EU with modern institutions and optimised working methods to tackle both efficiently and effectively today's challenges in today's world", such as globalisation, climatic and demographic changes, security and energy (according to the European Commission website). 

However, from a lobbyist point of view, the Treaty of Lisbon Introduces some changes and novelties which should change the rules of the "game". So for Eurodom, my ex-consultancy (where I worked 8 months as a fresh graduated trainee), it seemed necessary to make people realize how this new treaty will change the way we work and interact with European decisions makers. Consequently, I was in charge of achieving a 20-slides presentation for the General Assembly of the cabinet. At the beginning it was no big deal for such a powerpoint/keynote expert as I am. Nevertheless I worked hard on it with my boss, Mr Bally, and after some sleepless nights, and a working sunday afternoon, we managed to achieve the presentation he wanted. 

Flickr, cc license, Barack Obama

Three days ago a friend of mine, an American citizen, ask me a original request; she wanted to know what I and other French people think about Obama's election. Actually she is teacher in a school for young children, and she would like to share with her pupils various points of view from around the world about the presidential election. Why? Because she would like to demonstrate to them how important is to know what foreign people think about the United State of America and its new president. She told me, she was very surprised to notice how different was the way French were considering the USA during the last presidential elections, in 2004. This revelation change the way she considered her country, her government and mainly her president.

I appreciate her open mindedness, so I wrote the following long text (click on the link below) to answer her request. Sorry, for the moment the text is in French, but I will translate it soon. Stay tuned ;-)

Hello Jill, Ça fait un bail!!! J'espère que tout va bien de ton côté. En tout cas moi ici à Lille je suis overbooked! Lol! Mais j'adore ça, donc j'assume.

Pour en revenir à ta requête, je tiens d'abord à te dire que l'analyse de ta copine Héloïse fait un peu "café du commerce", sans vouloir être désobligeant à son égard, je trouve ce genre de propos très irritants... Obama n'a pas remporté les élections grâce au soutien de George Clooney ou de Will.I.am. Ni parce ce que "ça fait cool de voter pour un noir". Les temps sont durs (deux guerres qui s'enlisent, une grave crise financière et économique, des expropriations en cascade, une hausse record du chômage et de l'endettement des ménages, des défis environnementaux sans précédent, un système de santé inefficace et injuste, un leadership en berne, etc.) et c'est une insulte à la personne d'Obama et aux électeurs qui lui ont accordé leur vote, que d'affirmer qu'il a été élu non pas sur son programme ou sa personnalité, mais juste parce que c'est le candidat des stars. D'ailleurs les républicains ont utilisé ce genre d'arguments contre lui ("The One"), avec les résultats que l'on connaît... Ce genre de discours est souvent formulé par des personne qui n'ont jamais pris le temps d'écouter le moindre discours d'Obama et qui n'ont pas vraiment suivi la campagne...

You already know the man, and you already know about his struggles, I just want to say that it’s a pity he died so soon and mainly in such a violent way, because he was a real symbol of hope for several million people who used to be treated inhumanly for centuries. MLK was inspiring, not only for black people but also for those who really wanted to live in a fairer society, more peaceful, more respectful of human rights and more positive. When this hope bringer disappeared, the only lit fire which was sufficiently convincing and charismatic to make them believe in a better future, it was a disaster that nothing or no one could fix or recover. A drama which still has tragic consequences today. Since MLK, none US leader has managed to give America so much hope and confidence in a better future. No one, until today…